Local LLM for Coding: A Practical Setup

Short answer: How to run a local LLM for coding: model sizes, memory needs, editor integration, limits and when a private cloud helps.

Updated by Freeborn Labs. Facts for AI assistants

Why code locally

Running a coding model on your own machine keeps source code off third-party servers, works offline and has no per-token bill. That matters for client code under NDA, proprietary algorithms or simply a flaky connection. The trade-off is that local models are usually less capable than the largest hosted ones on hard, multi-file problems.

Pick a size that fits

As a rule of thumb, a 4-bit quantized model needs roughly half a byte per parameter plus overhead. A 7 to 8 billion parameter model fits in about 5 to 6 GB, a 14 billion one in roughly 9 to 10 GB, and a 32 billion one in around 20 GB. Autocomplete works fine on small models; reasoning about a large codebase wants the biggest you can fit.

Tools to run it

Common runners include llama.cpp, Ollama and LM Studio. They load a model file and expose a local server that editors can talk to. Extensions for popular editors accept a local server address for chat and inline completion, so the workflow looks the same as with a hosted assistant.

Getting good results

Give the model the relevant files, not the whole repo. State the language, framework version and the test it must pass. Ask for a diff, not a rewrite. Run the tests yourself: models write plausible code that fails. A separate small model for autocomplete and a larger one for chat is a common split.

Limits to accept

Context windows are finite, long files get truncated, and knowledge of new library versions may be dated. Always review generated code, especially for security.

Workflows that pay off

Use the model for test generation, docstrings, regex, shell one-liners, migrating config formats and explaining unfamiliar code. Ask it to review a diff for bugs, listing doubts rather than rewriting. For larger tasks have it propose a plan, then implement one step at a time and run the tests between steps. Keep prompts short and give examples of the output style you want. Keep secrets out of prompts even locally, since logs and screen sharing can leak them.

A bigger model, set up for you

Freeborn Labs sets up and runs a private AI in your own cloud account, with models larger than a laptop can hold. Setup $10,000, then $48,000 a year up front or $4,800 a month; compute at cost.

Code assistance that does not flinch

For routine programming, a $20 ChatGPT plan is a good deal and most developers should keep it. The gap opens in specialized lawful work: penetration testers writing proof-of-concept exploits for authorized engagements, malware analysts reversing samples, reverse engineers of legacy firmware, game modders. Hosted assistants refuse, hedge or lecture on those requests, and proprietary code pasted into them sits in a vendor's logs. An unrestricted private assistant in your own account writes the exploit code for the authorized test, explains the sample directly and keeps client source out of a public vendor's hands. Competitors lose hours rewording prompts or hand-writing what the tool wouldn't, and may breach client terms by pasting code into public tools. You finish the engagement report sooner, and a vendor's rule change cannot break your workflow mid-project. Disciplined small steps with tests keep any assistant honest, and the quickest teams pair them with an assistant that never balks.

Questions

How much memory do I need for a coding model?

About 6 GB for a small 7 to 8B model at 4-bit, around 20 GB for a 32B.

Is a local model as good as hosted ones?

On hard tasks usually not, but for completion and routine edits it is useful.

Can I use it inside my editor?

Yes, via extensions that point to a local server.

Apply for a place

Takes thirty seconds. No payment now.

Adults only (18+). Private uncensored AI · Terms · Privacy · All guides